Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Haack, Susan
dc.date.issued 2011-05-26
dc.identifier.citation Haack, S. (2011). Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent. A 'Standards of proof and scientific evidence'. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 3 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
dc.description.abstract Susan Haack, University of Miami, organizes her lecture in the following points: 1. Standards of proof are best understood as degrees of warrant. 2. Degrees of warrant aren't mathematical probabilities. 3. Commonwealth v. Sacco and Vanzetti: epistemology trumps probability theory. 4. People v. Collins: epistemology trumps probability again
dc.format.mimetype video/H263
dc.format.mimetype audio/mpeg
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret
dc.relation.ispartofseries Standards of proof and scientific evidence
dc.rights Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/deed.ca
dc.subject Prova (Dret) -- Congressos
dc.subject Evidence (Law) -- Congresses
dc.subject Dret -- Filosofia -- Congressos
dc.subject Law -- Philosophy -- Congresses
dc.title Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

Show simple item record

Related Items

Search DUGiMedia


Browse

My Account

Statistics

You can copy this text:

This file is restricted

The file you are attempting to access is a restricted file and requires credentials to view. Please login below to access the file.

  1. We will contact you via the email address you have provided us.