DUGiMedia
2090.mp4
2090.mp3
Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.issued
2011-05-26
dc.identifier.citation
Haack, S. (2011). Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent. A 'Standards of proof and scientific evidence'. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 3 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
Susan Haack, University of Miami, organizes her lecture in the following points: 1. Standards of proof are best understood as degrees of warrant. 2. Degrees of warrant aren't mathematical probabilities. 3. Commonwealth v. Sacco and Vanzetti: epistemology trumps probability theory. 4. People v. Collins: epistemology trumps probability again
dc.description.tableofcontents
2090.mp4
2090.mp3
dc.format.mimetype
video/H263
audio/mpeg
dc.language.iso
Anglès
dc.publisher
Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Standards of proof and scientific evidence
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent
dc.type
Conferència/Classe
dc.rights.accessrights
Accés obert