2096.mp4
2096.mp3
Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.issued
2011-05-27
dc.identifier.citation
Roberts, P. (2011). Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials. A 'Standards of proof and scientific evidence'. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 6 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2096
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
Dr. Paul Roberts, University of Nottingham, organizes his lecture in the following points: Introduction: sources of anxiety and dispute; 1. Case histories. 2. Institutional context and normative framework. a) Apellate review of criminal convenctions, b) Error of law, c) Trial by jury, d) Precedent, law and fact. 3. Enduring epistemic challenges (science, experts and forensic proof). a) Medical evidence in forensic context, b) Scientific uncertainty and disagreement between experts, c) Conflicts of experts authority and witness credibility. Conclusion: doing justice to expert evidence and scientific proof
dc.description.tableofcontents
2096.mp4
2096.mp3
dc.format.mimetype
video/H263
audio/mpeg
dc.language.iso
Anglès
dc.publisher
Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Standards of proof and scientific evidence
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials
dc.type
Conferència/Classe
dc.rights.accessrights
Accés obert