Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and  legal epistemology in english criminal trials

dc.contributor.author	Roberts, Paul
dc.date.issued	2011-05-27
dc.identifier.citation	Roberts, P. (2011). Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials. A 'Standards of proof and scientific evidence'. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 6 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2096
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2096
dc.description.abstract	Dr. Paul Roberts, University of Nottingham, organizes his lecture in the following points: Introduction: sources of anxiety and dispute; 1. Case histories. 2. Institutional context and normative framework. a) Apellate review of criminal convenctions, b) Error of law, c) Trial by jury, d) Precedent, law and fact. 3. Enduring epistemic challenges (science, experts and forensic proof). a) Medical evidence in forensic context, b) Scientific uncertainty and disagreement between experts, c) Conflicts of experts authority and witness credibility. Conclusion: doing justice to expert evidence and scientific proof
dc.format.mimetype	video/H263
dc.format.mimetype	audio/mpeg
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Standards of proof and scientific evidence
dc.rights	Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/deed.ca
dc.subject	Prova (Dret) -- Congressos
dc.subject	Evidence (Law) -- Congresses
dc.subject	Dret -- Filosofia -- Congressos
dc.subject	Law -- Philosophy -- Congresses
dc.title	Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture