1578.mp4
haack-p-causation.mp3
Proving causation: the holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.issued
2010-03-18
dc.identifier.citation
Haack, S. (2010). Proving causation: the holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert. A Grup de recerca en Filosofia del Dret. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 26 abril 2010]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/1578
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
As my title indicates, [this conference] focuses on causation evidence in toxic-tort litigation; and as my sub-title suggests, it makes two main arguments, the first epistemological and the second legal. The epistemological argument is that, under certain conditions, as congeries of evidence warrants a conclusion to a higher degree than any of its components alone would do; the legal argument, interlocking with this, is that our evidence law imposes a kind of atomism than can actually impede the process of arriving at the conclusion most warranted by evidence - the effects of wich have been specially salient to causation eveidence in toxic-tort cases
dc.description.tableofcontents
1578.mp4
haack-p-causation.mp3
dc.format.mimetype
audio/mpeg
video/H263
dc.language.iso
Anglès
dc.publisher
Universitat de Girona. Departament de Dret Privat
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Grup de recerca en Filosofia del Dret
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Proving causation: the holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert
dc.type
Conferència/Classe
dc.rights.accessrights
Accés obert